It is an almost impossible task trying to talk to people not accept that there are other views on a particular subject. In the same way that I could say that the notes C, E and G represent a C major chord, and someone else might interpret as a Sun 11/13, on policy of a country also there are other views. Unfortunately, many government supporters - believe that no citizen should be a follower of a government as this would imply the endorsement by "loyalty" of everything you do - do not accept other views. The letter referred to written by Mr. Fontova is precisely this line of thinking. Why? Because it is allocating to Clarin - without the possibility of another vision - the root of all or nearly all, the government's actions, a kind of "I'm angry because you make me angry."
By the way, I share a simple example of intolerance. Recently, Mr. Lito Epumer (or someone with his name and photos), from his Facebook, he shared the thought of Mr. Fontova, thought I mentioned mentioning a few short ideas I share in this paper. Mr Epumer reaction was answered by saying that I was bullied by commenting on what he wrote in his Facebook wall. Immediately canceled the relationship between the parties established by the network. As you can see is a clear sign of intolerance. Is it forbidden to discuss ideas?
One of the core elements of social networks is the ability to discuss thoughts of people involved, but it seems that Mr. Epumer not willing to allow dissent with his comments. I do not think it represents a democratic conduct. Should not we be mature to accept that we disagree? I do not care
Clarín or defend their businesses - to defend them - but that to name all the time sounds like lack of arguments or attempt to conceal the true purposes.
There are many newspapers in Argentina and what Clarin said in its way, Chronicle says of another, one with another, the capital to another, so we can follow.
What Channel 13 says in a way, America says another, Telefé says another, the public TV to another, and so we continue. In short, the public plays what you want even before the same message delivered by a single channel.
Now, does this means, for example, the idea is that football again be encrypted? You have to be limited to think that way. With cable TV rates we pay football should have been free forever.
The point is that I can not accept everything the government does, simply because a law that benefits me. Let's look further.
There are issues where the government leave room without explanation. I will mention some of them.
• The scandal of the suitcases.
• The money for the campaign came from companies doing business with ephedrine.
• The conduct of some members of unions.
• The growing insecurity that leaves us all at the mercy of criminals. The Government seems to live in another country and makes no representations, and what is worse, do nothing, to meet with governors to develop a national security plan. Do we have to create a group of mothers of murdered children, husbands or wives riddled, or Children of shot, that the national government do something?
• If the nationalization of the administrators was to create social programs rather than genuine retirement funds is just selling smoke. Retirement funds should be just that. Do not touch that money for something else. Could anyone mention how the government handles money of all workers?
• I agree with retirement "universal", but that should not suggest the idea of \u200b\u200bavoiding work or to promote the culture of not working. So are not educated. Every day I hear people, especially kids, who say "why should I laburar or study? Just give you everything. "
Work Culture"? People attending eaters says continually that many people who attend or plan to go to work because the government's plan. Is not it appropriate to provide work for pay? When lack of work the Government must invest in public works, if necessary, be resurfacing streets that are in perfect condition but we must keep people working, with that injected money and create work culture.
Just to mention: worker cooperatives supervised by the University announced some time ago in one of the few press conferences, do not exist in Rosario, despite seeing them in ads during football games on Sundays.
• On the issue of retentions on soy, the government put them all in the same bag. Of course, that is not noticeable in the Capital, whose inhabitants have to hear what others mention. Inside the country are closed refrigeration, dairy, and gone a HUGE number of small producers (do not think that there are only these two or three that are overweight twine). If people are planting soybeans is because you choose to raise cows for meat or milk extract.
"analyzed how much they pay per kilo live the producer, or a liter of milk, and how much we pay at the butcher or supermarket? Why the huge gap? What does the Government to prevent the impressive amount of dosh to be between producer and consumer? There is much more than supply and demand. Small farmers - say, people who have 200 acres - can not cope with certain levels of tax. How is to reinvest and keep everything? Who said they recovered small producers where?
• The management of import / export has resulted in the loss of major export contracts. The Government decided to close the import (including staples for health) for the favorable trade balance figures show. Suppose we have a small company that exports and reach a contract with a foreign country. Abroad using clear rules and contracts are respected. What if I tell the country that I will not be able to meet the delivery because the government - Mr. Moreno - decided to close the entry of an input? Simple: lose the contract. That, precisely, happens with a lot of company SMEs.
• Are we talking about credit? Do we have idea of \u200b\u200bthe interest charged by credit card, for example, to finance the balance minimum payment? Is it easy access to a mortgage loan, such that the government announced with great fanfare? If we consult with the banks are going to learn that nobody in need to reach your first home can be accessed.
• What distribution? The government spends a lot of dosh to subsidize transportation in Buenos Aires forgetting the rest of the country. But surely, people in Buenos Aires travels in perfect condition and exact times, right? "What!? Do you travel wrong?, then the government is spending the money badly to everyone.
• What we do with the Latin American Union? Many union but Brazil is cut alone. What can we offer the world with this union? Does the world need us? The European Union can cope with large economies, but with the Latin American Union can achieve something equivalent?
There is a very Che Guevara, but Che left his profession and belongings by following his conviction, sorry, but I see the same in many waving the flag. Why
Chile has no problems with the FTAA? Its people are more than happy with their government. Are we not be victims of a disinformation campaign? Chile
disappeared "? Do your people are under pressure from the American empire? Are your factories closed? Does your economy down?
• The apparent distribution of money that leaves out the middle class. For example, assigning "universal" because child is not as "universal." We continually hear that will be left to the kids who attend private schools if that was synonymous with economic slack. I recall that there are parents who break their backs working to send their children to private school - where they pay $ 1000 per month. They also have the right to receive the allowance.
• Less poor? Where? The villas have more people every day. I invite anyone who wants to visit the casino of Rosario, to enjoy the wonderful show that brings the people of the towns risking the government's plans. So educate, or do believe that educating the gift of a netbook?
• Before nationalize airlines could invest in the reopening of the railways that would benefit whole villages and federalism favor through better communication. Continue to pay rates and high costs. Let us traveling by bus is more expensive and less safe.
• Cortes Street, roadblocks that impede the movement of people flutes has to do with the claim. In Argentina, no matter what the procedure is banned, is still screwing working people and the Government continues to allow this to proceed. What if we cut a street in Germany? The police come and you out because you can not do, of course, here you say repression.
• The desire to continually look back. European countries experienced wars trimmers went ahead by looking to the future. Or do we believe that in Spain named Franco every day or those who were with him? Surely, there is a social condemnation and firm conviction never return to that state. By the way, the Argentine government to clarify the AMIA bombing and the Embassy of Israel? Sentences are the culprits?
• The specter of private hands, what bad word! Ever wonder how people survive the First World countries with such huge media networks (where Clarín could not get close)?. Do not see where there are ghosts.
• Consider the issue of Fibertel. The Government has decided to revoke, cancel, remove (put the word you want) your ISP license. Probably be right, but let's look at government advertising and see what happens for example in Rosario, Fibertel users.
The government says there is a huge amount of Internet providers: LIE. In Rosario we basically Arnet (which uses phone line), Express (Internet provider's local cable TV services and mobile phone companies.
If the person was not living where the service Fibertel Express (Cable TV) is not covered, only has two options: Arnet (Telecom) and access to mobile phone companies. But, also has no landline phone, you have only one possibility: the service of mobile companies , which is scary, and with a exorbitant price.
The government says that the user will pay the same amount it paid to Fibertel: LIE. You must pay the subscription you pay anyone. If the payment equal to the one in Fibertel has a cost greater than that paid, will have to pay more.
Conclusion: If Fibertel disappears, many customers remain without Internet or have to spend more to access the Internet. What blame the users for this? None. The Government should consider a solution that does the harm. But it seems that it is easier to brothel before thinking a solution.
How should the Government proceed if you do things right? Take over the company (So \u200b\u200bthat customers do not have problems) until another company to take the service (which should not belong to a friend of power, but too much to ask).
• What are analyzed every so often the Internet access costs paid in U.S. or Europe? If we compare these costs with those who pay in Argentina we will find beautiful surprises he observed how we steal. Why the government does nothing to Telecom and Telefonica to lower those costs? The solution is not force by decree to lower tariffs, but to attract new companies with facilities or tax breaks in exchange for providing a good service, nice and cheap for the whole country. That would be a real policy would force the others to compete.
Why only two companies have split the range phone market city? Why do other countries have more companies? That way, users choose where they want to be. That's competition. Did something the Argentine government to improve the situation? Privatization of Entel criticize but do nothing to improve the current scenario.
• Why does milk last year was worth $ 3.00 and $ 4.00 today? Why two years ago a premium-brand rice sold for $ 5 and now costs $ 10? What does the INDEC about it? The explained as a realignment of prices. Great! To calculate the INDEC inflation includes the cost of airplanes, boats, golf clubs, and yes, it will keep its cost - in dollars - and thus the closing numbers.
I will not fall into the same thing as saying critical, since the other path, that everything is wrong. The Government has made good decisions - that could be improved. However, we should never give up control to the President in turn support the good and criticizing the bad. It is the only way we progress as a country. 2496audio
